<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://indivisibilities.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AMugumeTejelo</id>
	<title>User:MugumeTejelo - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://indivisibilities.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AMugumeTejelo"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indivisibilities.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:MugumeTejelo&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-06T23:37:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://indivisibilities.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:MugumeTejelo&amp;diff=14927&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>MugumeTejelo: Created page with &quot;A recent report in relation to a group of researchers in NTU, Singapore, caught my attention i decided to write something about nanotechnology in the cosmetics industry. The arti...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://indivisibilities.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:MugumeTejelo&amp;diff=14927&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-02-23T10:32:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;A recent report in relation to a group of researchers in NTU, Singapore, caught my attention i decided to write something about nanotechnology in the cosmetics industry. The arti...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A recent report in relation to a group of researchers in NTU, Singapore, caught my attention i decided to write something about nanotechnology in the cosmetics industry. The article, titled &amp;quot;Nano-sized chemical in sunscreen, cosmetics, might lead to cancer, say scientists,&amp;quot; was published November 29th on Yahoo News. A while after that, another band of researchers came out and said that this isn&amp;#039;t true and that it isn&amp;#039;t a cause for concern. What exactly should we believe?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.memebeautyshop.com/ kosmetik] Nanotechnology isn&amp;#039;t new nonetheless it can be a term which includes been recently brought up time and again to raise awareness amongst the general public. People who haven&amp;#039;t heard from the term prior to recent months think that this is really a large amount inside arena of cosmetic research. And actually, it is. But not just in cosmetics and beauty. I find it highly ironic how the field of beauty and private care should seemingly be one that generates the most speculation and desire for nanotechnology because nanotechnology itself is very useful in lots of other regions of science as well. Cosmetic companies make use of this term to entice potential customers by making their goods sound technologically advanced. What people don&amp;#039;t realise is the very fact that nanotechnology is making waves too, within the field of biomedical science, such as getting a cure for cancer and treating illnesses via the non-invasive way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the article mentioned above, a group of scientists are telling us that zinc oxide inside nano form could be harmful and cause cancer. Now this could scare many people off beauty items that contain zinc oxide although we will ask sales assistants whether these oxide particles are nano-sized, the likelihood is they wouldn&amp;#039;t know for sure. Yet, I have faith that this really is hardly any cause for concern. Firstly, the researchers remain inside beginning of the research. This signifies that any findings they have usually are not substantial enough to warrant zinc oxide to become labelled as carcinogenic. Secondly, if one does some investigation on your own own, you&amp;#039;ll discover that past scientific research have shown zinc oxide within the nanoparticle form to become anti-tumour agents targeting cancerous cells 1,2,3. So the real question should be: What will be the difference relating to the various sets of cancer-causing and cancer-targeting nanoparticles of zinc oxide?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the research isn&amp;#039;t finished, experimental procedures can not be revealed. What I&amp;#039;d like to know is the reason the scientists are announcing their current findings once the research has not yet been completed. Here they are, telling the world that zinc oxide could possibly be cancer-causing and may be harmful. That&amp;#039;s something like me hinting that chocolate cake you&amp;#039;re about you can eat might be contaminated and cause diarrhoea but more people might have to consume it for all of us to learn for sure (assuming I ate it i had diarrhoea however could you should be lactose-intolerant). Perhaps they&amp;#039;re really excited regarding their current results but don&amp;#039;t go around telling people things you are not 100% sure of yet. Why are these oxides causing cells in cell cultures to multiply and exactly why are the oxides in Hanley&amp;#039;s and Wang&amp;#039;s studies doing the exact opposite? Could it be the synthesis method? Delivery method? Variants in shape and size with the nanoparticles? Dosage? What would be the differences inside intra- and intercellular interactions?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While nanotechnology in cosmetics can be a quite interesting topic, the other to possibly write endlessly about, consumers have got to get more aware on the part of the properties of these ingredients in addition to their capabilities where concerned. It may do not be a a dangerous thing to find out more about the things that you&amp;#039;re donning yourself, whether oahu is the latest liquid foundation or eye cream.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MugumeTejelo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>